A Tech­nical Editor’s Black­list

Howard Silcock   © 2023

This list is based on work carried out with fellow technical writers Barbara Jones and Diana Muzrimas.

We started out by collecting phrases that we corrected often enough to feel they should go onto a ‘blacklist’. Now I’ve added some more general material on a few topics not directly linked to specific phrases.

Keywords & Topics

Examples & Recommendations

able, ability

Avoid

users are able to customise the toolbar

Preferred

users can customise the toolbar

See also capable, capability

actionable

Avoid if possible, unless it means ‘could be the subject of a legal action’

adjacent to

Avoid

the code is printed on a label adjacent to the power button

Preferred

the code is printed on a label next to the power button

all of the …

Avoid

check that all of the details

Preferred

check that all details …

or

check that the details …

allowed to, not

Avoid

account holders are not allowed to allocate …

Preferred

account holders must not allocate …

and/or

Avoid unless necessary to avoid ambiguity

as a consequence of

Preferred

because

at the end of the day

Omit

at the present time, at this point in time

Use now or just omit

Avoid

at this point in time no decision has been taken

Preferred

no decision has been taken

or (better)

we haven’t decided

aware of

Avoid

site staff are aware of the new communication port settings

Preferred

site staff know the new communication port settings

basically

Omit (almost always)

basis

below

[Rewritten March 2023]

The word below is not an adjective, so if you write ‘the below table’, people may criticise you for being ungrammatical. However, if you change it to ‘the table below’, that will probably appease them.

It’s natural to ask why. The traditional grammarian’s answer is that the ‘below’ in the phrase ‘the table below’ is an adverb, and adverbs aren’t constrained in their position in the way that adjectives are.

I accepted that explanation when I first wrote this entry. However, reading it again recently, I asked myself: how on earth can that ‘below’ be an adverb? The traditional description of an adverb is ‘a word that modifies the meaning of a verb, adjective or other adverb’. Well, that ‘below’ doesn’t modify any word in that sentence.

So why, then, is ‘the table below’ acceptable? And what is ‘below’ in that phrase if it’s not an adverb?

I think I found an answer while reading about how linguists have been revisiting how some words are assigned to word classes (or ‘parts of speech’) in English grammar. One change they’ve introduced is to enlarge the class of prepositions. Traditional grammarians insist that a preposition must be followed by a noun or pronoun. This means, for example, that ‘before’ cannot be a preposition in either ‘that was before he died’ or ‘he’s been here before’, though it is a preposition in ‘before Tuesday’. Instead, in the first case, they classify ‘before’ as a ‘subordinating conjunction’; in the second case as an adverb; and in the third case as a preposition. Assigning ‘before’ to these three different classes in this way seems quite unnatural, as the constructions are otherwise very similar. Furthermore, saying that the ‘before’ in ‘he’s been here before’ is an adverb seems just as inappropriate as calling the ‘below’ in ‘the table below’ an adverb, and for the same reason – it doesn’t modify anything. Linguists have now removed the restriction about being followed by a noun or pronoun and ‘before’ is treated as a preposition in all three cases. If we accept this change, then we can argue in the same way that the ‘below’ in the phrase ‘the table below’ is a preposition, even though there’s no noun after it. And that is the ‘real’ reason why the phrase is grammatical.

An interesting side observation here is that the word above is treated differently from ‘below’, though you would think the two words are parallel. People are now accepting that ‘above’ can be an adjective – so ‘the above table’ is OK.

Avoid

See the below table/figure/…

Preferred

See the table/figure/… below

capable, capability

Avoid

the system is capable of handling up to ten requests

the system has capability to handle up to ten requests

provides the user with the capability to set preferences

Preferred

the system can handle up to ten requests

allows the user to set preferences

See also: able, ability

comprises of, is comprised of

Avoid

the program is comprised of the following projects

Preferred

the program comprises the following projects

consequence

Avoid

the system exhibits a degradation in response time

Preferred

the system responses are slower or the system is slower

(Used as verbs or as adjectives)

double click

right click

right hand

left hand

left click

Preferred

double-click

right-click

right-hand

left-hand

left-click or just click

(The Microsoft Style Guide recommends using ‘click’ and ‘right-click’ – even when, for a left-hander, ‘right-clicking’ may actually be done with the left mouse button!)

Double Negatives

not unexpected

not illegal

not impossible

not unreasonable

Avoid

it is not unreasonable to expect …

Preferred

it is reasonable to expect …

e.g.

Use only where space is limited (for example, in a table).

Preferred

for example

event

exist(s)

Keep this word for philosophical discussions about ontology and the meaning of life.

Avoid

a second server exists to provide back-up

Preferred

there is a second server to provide back-up,

or just

a second server provides back-up

experience

Almost always to be avoided (long-winded and pretentious!):

Avoid

delays in service may be experienced

our aim is to provide an enhanced user experience

during the system upgrade users may experience a degradation in response time

deliver a positive client experience

Preferred

there may be delays

our aim is to improve our user interface or to make our system easier to use

the system may be slower during upgrade

satisfy the client

following

Preferred

after

going forward

Avoid at all costs.

Preferred

in the future or from now on

iaw

Write in full

Preferred

in accordance with

i.e.

Use only where space is limited (for example, in a table).

Preferred

that is

All technical documents provide information or instructions. It’s tedious to keep using the word ‘information’.

Avoid

this document provides information regarding …

for more information regarding xxx, see …

this document provides information on how to …

Preferred

this document is about …

for more on xxx, see …

this document tells you how to …

or

this document explains how to …

Avoid

a new processor was installed, in order to improve execution time

Preferred

a new processor was installed to improve execution time

Reword – there’s almost always a simpler way to say it

Avoid

in the event of an unexpected system shutdown

Preferred

if the system shuts down unexpectedly

in view of the fact that

Preferred

because

inserted in

Preferred

in (not in all cases – use judgement)

In software environments, often thought to be a more ‘elegant’ word for problem or error. But it actually makes the meaning more obscure.

Avoid

Users should report any issues with the new release to the Help desk

Preferred

Users should report any problems with the new release to the Help desk

it’s, its

Incorrect

within the majority of it’s networks

when its appropriate …

when its been decided …

Correct

within the majority of its networks

when it’s appropriate … or when it is appropriate …

when it’s been decided … or when it has been decided …

-ize

Preferred

-ise

left hand

leverage, leveraged

Although these words are appropriate in certain contexts, don't use them simply as fancy substitutes for use and used, unless you want your documents to read like advertising guff.

Preferred

use or used (generally says it better)

located in/on/under/ …

Omit located

Preferred

in/on/under/

(as verbs)
login, logon, logout, logoff
setup, set-up
shutdown, shut-down
startup, start-up
timeout, time-out

Using a hyphen or running the two words together is correct and easier to read when you use one of these phrases as an adjective or a noun (eg 'set-up procedure' or 'a timeout of one minute'). But when you use the phrase as a verb, follow the pattern of 'shut up', 'sit down', 'hold on', and so on.

Avoid

Users are required to login

Next you must set-up your profile

Preferred

Users are required to log in

Next you must set up your profile

multiple

Avoid

where multiple users share a printer

Preferred

where more than one user/ several/a number of users share a printer

Nominalis­ations
(nouns from verbs)

implemen­tation

termi­nation

activi­ties

reinstall­ation

Nominalisation is forming nouns from other parts of speech, particu­larly verbs – eg ‘implement­ation’ from ‘implement’. It’s very common in techni­cal and busi­ness writing, and chokes the life out many sentences. A verb usually depicts some­thing happening – ‘data flows’, ‘a window closes’ or ‘a computer crashes’ – and there­fore evokes a vivid mental image. A noun, on the other hand, usually labels a thing and evokes a more static image of some­thing that’s just ‘there’. If you nomina­lise a verb, the mental image becomes less vivid and you drain the sen­tence of some of its life.

When a piece of writing befuddles your brain, check out the verbs. Often you’ll find that the author’s nominalised all the strong, active ones and pieced them together with weaker ones like ‘is’, ‘has’, ‘proceeds’, ‘occurs’, and so on.

Avoid

responsible for the implementation of the package

following the termination of the program

monitoring activities undertaken by users of Tivoli

the contractor was tasked to undertake reinstallation of the package (or to take carriage of the reinstallation of the package )

Preferred

responsible for implementing the package

after the program ends [or, if you must, terminates]

monitoring what Tivoli users do

we asked the contractor to install the package again

not able to be

This awkward phrase is often a signal that someone’s trying to evade responsibility for something that happened by making it seem as if it was caused by a shortcoming in some inanimate object

Avoid

the fault was not able to be found

the deadline was not able to be met

Preferred

we couldn’t find the fault

we didn’t meet the deadline or – just maybe! – the deadline was unrealistic

Avoid

passwords are changed on a monthly basis

funding for travel is provided on a cost-benefit basis

Preferred

passwords are changed monthly

funding for travel is provided when benefits justify the cost

order

prerequisites required

Preferred

prrequisites

provide

Some verbs can be used with both a direct object and an indirect object but provide isn’t one of them.

Avoid

Our aim is to provide the reader an overview of the project.

Preferred

Our aim is to provide the reader with an overview of the project.

Our aim is to provide an overview of the project for the reader.

First, let's be clear how I’m using the term indirect object. A traditional grammarian might say that all the three sentences quoted above have indirect objects, but current thinking is more restrictive. For example, in the two sentences ‘I gave my son a present ’ and ‘I gave a present to my son’, only the first is regarded nowadays as containing an indirect object. In the second, ‘my son' occurs inside a prepositional phrase ‘to my son’, which means it plays a quite different role in the structure of the sentence and doesn't have the characteristics required of an object.

Only certain verbs can be used, like give, with an indirect object in this narrower sense – these verbs are said to be ditransitive – and provide isn’t a ditransitive verb.

If we had the verb give in the original sentence, we’d be OK, because with give we can say ‘Our aim is to give the reader an overview of the project’. Here, the direct object is ‘an overview of the project’ is and the indirect object is ‘the reader’. The sentence is grammatical because the verb give is ditransitive, and so can have both direct and indirect objects. The indirect object is almost invariably put in front of the direct object, as in this example. But we can’t do this with provide because it isn’t ditransitive.

Here’s a list (probably not exhaustive, but perhaps exhausting) of ditransitive verbs: accord, afford, allocate, allow, appoint, ask, assign, assure, award, bake, bear, bet, borrow, bring, bring back, build, buy, call, catch, cause, charge, consider, cook, cost, cut, deal, deem, deliver, deny, design, do, draw, drop, earn, email, feed, find, fine, forbid, get, get onto, give, grant, guarantee, hand, hunt, keep, label, leave, lend, let in on, let know, loan, lose, mail, make, name, offer, order, owe, pass, permit, play, plug into, prescribe, profit, promise, purchase, put by, quote, read, refuse, regift, render, run by, run past, save, sell, send, serve, set, show, shower with, sneak, spare, supply, take, teach, tell, throw, wean off, win, wish, work, write.

presented

Avoid

the window was presented

Preferred

the window was displayed

prior to

Preferred

before

referenced

Avoid

a list of all sources referenced is provided at the end of the paper

Preferred

a list of all sources referred to is provided at the end of the paper

or

references are at the end of the paper

resource

Preferred

(when referring to a person) employee, staff member, or worker

right hand

set-up, set up

shut-down, shut down

singular or plural?

Often plurals can make for ambiguity. In the following example, it isn’t clear how many switches and how many routers there are per location. Using singulars with each can make things much clearer. Even when there’s no ambiguity, switching to a singular can sometimes help the reader to form a clearer mental picture.

Avoid

At key locations, the XYZ devices are connected between the switches and the two routers.

Preferred

At each key location, an XYZ device is connected between the switch and each of the two routers.

slash (or solidus)

Don’t write word1/word2 just because you can’t decide whether word1 or word2 is the right one.

start-up, start up

terms

timeout, time out

utilise/utilize

Preferred

use

via

Preferred

by/through/using

web site

Preferred

website

According to a discussion on the AustechWriter list, website is becoming more common. But you could probably still use web site if you prefer. Sources advocating website include http://www.askoxford.com/ … and the Macquarie dictionary, as well as various usage guides. But others favour web site, or even Web site. (The latter’s because Web is short for World Wide Web. However, The Times Style Guide and The Guardian Style Guide now even advocate world wide web and internet.)

who is/are, which is/are, that is/are

Avoid

users who are granted this role will have Support files, which are owned and controlled by …

Preferred

users granted this role will have Support files owned and controlled by …

within

Preferred

in